Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 0:35:40 GMT -5
Cantorne has been at the concentration in Madrid on IRPH and increasing mortgages that has been organized by the group of affected people with the support also of the PAH of Madrid in front of the Supreme Court. In statements to Economist & Jurist she points out shortly before her intervention that “ the Supreme Court must endorse the CJEU's theses from the last ruling of July of this year. We cannot forget that it is Europe that currently determines the scope of justice in Spain with community jurisprudence that is mandatory for any of the 27 EU states.”
In his opinion, “ it is a matter of time before the IRPH is Email Data brought down . ” From Sumar, now as a deputy in Congress, we are going to fight for this legislative reform . It is an illegal index as we have demonstrated with our studies in Consumption of the Balearic Islands. If this question is not prejudicial, it will be the ones that are pending resolution that will end up annulling it. For a few years now its abusive nature has been clear , perhaps due to its complexity the Supreme Court has not fully seen this problem that it generates for many families.”
From this report carried out by Consumo de Baleares “ it is logical that at a legal level there are some interpretations, but at a financial and mathematical level there cannot be . Reading it, one observes the existence of double remuneration from the IRPH that the Court of the Balearic Islands has not analyzed in its ruling. The Balearic ruling talks about transparency, but it does not talk about what the CJEU tells you to focus on specific issues and commissions.
In his opinion, the IRPH is an illegal index that should be replaced by Euribor. “ The solution is not only judicial , but it would be necessary to undertake a legislative reform that replaces this index with another and at the same time compensates people who are paying more on their mortgages because they have IRPH.
In his opinion, “ it is a matter of time before the IRPH is Email Data brought down . ” From Sumar, now as a deputy in Congress, we are going to fight for this legislative reform . It is an illegal index as we have demonstrated with our studies in Consumption of the Balearic Islands. If this question is not prejudicial, it will be the ones that are pending resolution that will end up annulling it. For a few years now its abusive nature has been clear , perhaps due to its complexity the Supreme Court has not fully seen this problem that it generates for many families.”
From this report carried out by Consumo de Baleares “ it is logical that at a legal level there are some interpretations, but at a financial and mathematical level there cannot be . Reading it, one observes the existence of double remuneration from the IRPH that the Court of the Balearic Islands has not analyzed in its ruling. The Balearic ruling talks about transparency, but it does not talk about what the CJEU tells you to focus on specific issues and commissions.
In his opinion, the IRPH is an illegal index that should be replaced by Euribor. “ The solution is not only judicial , but it would be necessary to undertake a legislative reform that replaces this index with another and at the same time compensates people who are paying more on their mortgages because they have IRPH.