Post by anik4300 on Feb 20, 2024 4:13:56 GMT -5
Events attended by lawyers, prosecutors and judges. Along with advertisements on the website and in the Anuário da Justiça collection , revenue from event promotion helps make the journalism we practice viable. Within his standard of morality, Luiz Vassallo wanted to know from the website whether interviewed judges are paid for this — something that may be common in the places where he works, but not at Consultor Jurídica . The list of the biggest litigants, which Vassallo hid from his readers, is on a page on the National Council of Justice (CNJ) portal — click here to access). Research carried out on the STF and STJ portals disproves the assumption that event sponsors are favored. In fact, the biggest litigants lose most of their cases in these courts and in the Judiciary in general. Not only in low-value causes, where defeats are crushing, but also in strategic causes, where there are million-dollar causes — such as those involving economic plans, in which banks were defeated mercilessly.
In other words: the newspaper did not give an example of the alleged trading of sentences in exchange for events because it could not find it. Contrary to what the editor intended, a conflict of interest did not occur. The accusation refuted itself on its own grounds. The trick doesn't change. To confuse the characterization of moral damage, the incrimination is disguised with verbs in the conditional mood. The biggest litigants in B USA Phone Number razil, not by chance, are the same corporations and public bodies that are among the biggest advertisers in the country's newspapers — such as Estadão — and are also the main sponsors of events promoted by journalistic companies. Estadão 's agenda , which consists of considering that sponsoring an event by the Association of Brazilian Magistrates compromises the ministers of the Supreme Court and the STJ, is inspiring. But it imposes a criterion and a question. The criterion is the notion that sponsorships imply undeniable considerations.
The question is whether the newspaper is immune to its own discretion. reproductionDirectly or indirectly, the country's biggest litigants paid R$171 million to Estadão in the last 15 months, according to estimates from the Boxnet platform, which specializes in advertising market analysis (click here to read the full spreadsheet). According to the logic that Estadão tries to sell on its pages, the newspaper itself is under serious suspicion and prevented from covering facts related to large banks and public authorities. Newspapers, as we know, enjoy a series of favors as they are considered a public service. The main one is the tax immunity provided for in article 150, item VI, item "d", of the Federal Constitution. Directly or indirectly, there are other benefits, such as the obligation for publicly traded companies to publish their balance sheets in printed newspapers. In other words: saying that the ethics required of the public sector do not apply to "private" journalism is not an absolute truth.
In other words: the newspaper did not give an example of the alleged trading of sentences in exchange for events because it could not find it. Contrary to what the editor intended, a conflict of interest did not occur. The accusation refuted itself on its own grounds. The trick doesn't change. To confuse the characterization of moral damage, the incrimination is disguised with verbs in the conditional mood. The biggest litigants in B USA Phone Number razil, not by chance, are the same corporations and public bodies that are among the biggest advertisers in the country's newspapers — such as Estadão — and are also the main sponsors of events promoted by journalistic companies. Estadão 's agenda , which consists of considering that sponsoring an event by the Association of Brazilian Magistrates compromises the ministers of the Supreme Court and the STJ, is inspiring. But it imposes a criterion and a question. The criterion is the notion that sponsorships imply undeniable considerations.
The question is whether the newspaper is immune to its own discretion. reproductionDirectly or indirectly, the country's biggest litigants paid R$171 million to Estadão in the last 15 months, according to estimates from the Boxnet platform, which specializes in advertising market analysis (click here to read the full spreadsheet). According to the logic that Estadão tries to sell on its pages, the newspaper itself is under serious suspicion and prevented from covering facts related to large banks and public authorities. Newspapers, as we know, enjoy a series of favors as they are considered a public service. The main one is the tax immunity provided for in article 150, item VI, item "d", of the Federal Constitution. Directly or indirectly, there are other benefits, such as the obligation for publicly traded companies to publish their balance sheets in printed newspapers. In other words: saying that the ethics required of the public sector do not apply to "private" journalism is not an absolute truth.